How do HIV and AIDS impact the use of natural resources by poor rural populations? The case of wild animal products

  • Sarah A. Kaschula Rhodes University
  • Charles M. Shackleton Rhodes University
Keywords: HIV/AIDS, natural resources, conservation, environment, bushmeat

Abstract

As a result of heightened financial and food insecurity, populations adversely affected by HIV and/or AIDS may be more likely to utilise wild natural resources to supplement their diet and livelihoods. Should this effect be pronounced, HIV and AIDS may pose a serious environmental threat. We explored the hypothesis that the presence of factors in the household, such as chronic illness in and recent mortality of individuals in a high HIV-risk age group, as well as the fostering of orphans, are associated with increased utilisation of wild animal products (WAPs) at the household level. We randomly surveyed 519 households from four sites in rural South Africa, recording household socio-economic status, the utilisation of wild animal products and health and demographic factors attributed to HIV or AIDS. Binary logistic regressions were used to test if households with markers of HIV and/or AIDS affliction were more likely to have a higher incidence and frequency of WAP utilisation relative to non-afflicted households, after adjusting for socio-economic and demographic variables. We found that, although households with markers of HIV and/or AIDS were generally poorer and had higher dependency ratios, there was no evidence to support the hypothesis that WAP harvesting was associated with either poverty, or markers of HIV and/or AIDS affliction. Our findings suggest that generalisations about a possible interaction between HIV and/or AIDS and the environment may not uniformly apply to all categories of natural resources or to all user groups.

Author Biography

Sarah A. Kaschula, Rhodes University
Columbia University
USA

References

1. Bolton S, Talman A. Interactions between HIV/AIDS and the environment: A review of the evidence and recommendations for next steps. Nairobi: IUCN-ESARO and IPPF-ARO; 2010.

2. Jooma MB. Southern Africa assessment: Food security and HIV/AIDS. Afr Secur Rev. 2005;14(1):59–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2005.9627336

3. Hammarskjold M. The environment, natural resources and HIV/AIDS. Geneva: SIDA Environment Policy Division; 2003.

4. Gillespie S, Kadiyala S. HIV/AIDS and food and nutrition security: From evidence to action. Washington DC: IFPRI; 2005.

5. Aliber M, Tlabela K, Drimie S, Walker C, Masika P. HIV/AIDS, land-based livelihoods and land reform in South Africa: Report to the International Food Policy Research Institute and the Department of Land Affairs, South Africa [document on the Internet]. c2006 [cited 2008 Dec 02]. Available from:http://www.sarpn.org.za/documents/d0002154/HIV_Land_reform_IFPRI_Jan2006.pdf

6. Hunter LM, De Souza RM, Twine W. The environmental dimensions of the AIDS pandemic: A call for scholarship and evidence-based intervention. Popul Environ. 2008;29:103–107.

7. Barany M, Hammett AL, Leakey RRB, Moore KM. Potential income generating opportunities for smallholders affected by HIV/AIDS: Linking agro-ecological change and non-timber forest product markets. J Manage Stud. 2005;39:26–39.

8. Hunter L, Twine W, Johnson A. Adult mortality and natural resource use in rural South Africa: Evidence from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance Site. Soc Nat Resour. 2011;24(3):256–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920903443327

9. Department of Health. HIV & AIDS and STI strategic plan for South Africa 2007–2011. Pretoria: Department of Health; 2007.

10. Barany M, Holding Anyonge C, Kayambazinthu D, Sitoe A. Firewood, food and medicine: Interactions between forests, vulnerability and rural responses to HIV/AIDS. In: Gillespie S, editor. Proceedings from the IFPRI Conference: HIV/AIDS and Food and Nutrition Security; 2005 Apr 14–16; Durban, South Africa. Washington DC: IFPRI. p. 120–135.

11. Dwasi J. HIV/AIDS and natural resource management in Africa: Findings from Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, and Uganda. Washington DC: Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG); 2002.

12. Quinlan T. The link between conservation and HIV/AIDS – what can be done? Durban: HEARD (Heath Economics and HIV/AIDS Division), University of Natal; 2004.

13. Torell E, Kalangahe B, Thaxton M, Issa A, Pieroth V, Tobey J. Guidelines for mitigating the impacts of HIV/AIDS on coastal biodiversity and natural resource management. Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau; 2007.

14. Challe J, Struik P. The impact on orchid species abundance of gathering edible tubers by HIV/AIDS orphans: A case of three villages in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Wageningen Life Sci. 2008;56(3):261–279.

15. Bodeker G, Kabatesi D, King R, Homsy J. A regional task force on traditional medicine and AIDS. Lancet. 2000;325(9211):1284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)74722-X

16. King R. Collaboration with traditional healers in HIV/AIDS prevention and care in sub-Saharan Africa. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2000.

17. Mander M. Marketing of indigenous medicinal plants in South Africa [document on the Internet]. c2010 [cited 2010 Nov 01]. Available from:http://www.fao.org/docrep/w9195e/w9195e00.HTM

18. Marcus T. Crafting in the context of AIDS and rural poverty: A livelihood strategy with prospects. Transformation. 2000;44:17–35.

19. Barnett T, Haslwimmer M. The effects of HIV/AIDS on farming systems in Africa. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 1995.

20. Campbell BM, Jeffrey S, Kozanayi W, Luckert M, Mutamba M, Zindi C. Household livelihoods in semi-arid regions. Jakarta: SMK Grafika Desa Putera, Centre for International Forestry Research; 2002.

21. Frank E, Unruh J. Demarcating forest containing disease: Land and AIDS in southern Zambia. Popul Environ. 2008;29:108–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11111-008-0067-8

22. Kaschula SA. Wild food use in household food security responses to HIV/AIDS. Popul Environ. 2008;29:162–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11111-008-0068-7

23. Ngwenya BN, Mosepele K. HIV/AIDS, artisanal fishing and food security in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Phys Chem Earth. 2007;32(15–18):1339–1349.

24. Murray C. Families divided: The impact of migrant labour in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.

25. Shackleton SE, Campbell B, Lotz S, Shackleton CM. Links between the local trade in natural products, livelihoods and poverty alleviation in a semi-arid region of South Africa. World Devel. 2008;36:505–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016

26. McGarry D, Shackleton CM. Is AIDS jeopardising biodiversity? Environ Conserv. 2009;36:5–7.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909005335

27. McGarry D, Shackleton CM. Children navigating rural poverty: Rural children’s use of wild resources to counteract food insecurity in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Child Poverty. 2009;15:19–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10796120802677594

28. Torell E, Tobey J, Thaxton M, et al. Examining the linkages between AIDS and biodiversity conservation in coastal Tanzania. Ocean Coast Manage. 2007;49:792–811.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.08.007

29. Barany M, Hammett AL, Stadler KM, Kengni E. Non-timber forest products in the food security and nutrition of smallholders afflicted by HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. For Trees Livelihoods. 2004;14:3–18.

30. UNAIDS. Adult (15–49) HIV prevalence percent by country, 1990–2007 [homepage on the Internet]. c2008 [cited 2008 Nov 01]. Available from:http://www.unaids.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/HIVData/Epidemiology/latestEpiData.asp

31. Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE. Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River valley, South Africa. Ecol Econ. 2006;57(2):306–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.011

32. Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety-nets: Evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2004;100:658–664.

33. Kaschula SA, Shackleton CM. Quantity and significance of wild meat off-take by a rural community in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Environ Conserv. 2009;36(03):192–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909990282

34. Timmermans HG. Rural livelihoods at Dwesa/Cwebe: Poverty, development and natural resource use on the Wild Coast, South Africa. MSc thesis, Grahamstown, Rhodes University, 2004.

35. White RM, Nyengane BN. Interactions between indigenous mammals and the human population in the Transkei. In: Proceedings of the Symposium of the Zoological Society of Southern Africa; 2004 Oct 12–14; Durban, South Africa. Zoological Society of Southern Africa; 2004.

36. Kiepel J, Quinlan T. Bridging the gap between research and planning in ‘sustainable development’ projects: Lessons from the Wild Coast. Transformation. 2009;41:33–54.

37. Hunter LM, Twine W, Patterson L. ‘Locusts are now our beef’: Adult mortality and household dietary use of local environmental resources in rural South Africa. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35:165–174.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14034950701356385, PMid:17676519, PMCid:2830104

38. Bachmann MO, Booysen FR. Relationships between HIV/AIDS, income and expenditure over time in deprived South African households. AIDS Care. 2004;16(7):817–826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540120412331290220, PMid:15385236

39.Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Food and Natural Resources Directorate – Vulnerability Assessment Committee. Regional emergency food security assessment report. Harare: SADC; 2004.

40. Madlala P, Marsland N, Van Zyl J, Drimie S. Towards identifying the vulnerability of AIDS afflicted households to food security: The RVAC-UNAIDS experiences: Challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the United Nations Regional Inter-Agency Coordination and Support Office: Measuring the impact of HIV/AIDS on food insecurity; 2003 Sept 9–11; Johannesburg, South Africa. Johannesburg: RIACSO; 2003.

41. Bachmann MO, Booysen LR. Health and economic impact of HIV/AIDS on South African households: A cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2003;3:14–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-3-14, PMid:12667263, PMCid:155544

42. Bollinger L, Stover J. The economic impact of AIDS [document on the Internet]. c1999 [cited 2011 Sept 13]. Available from:http://www.policyproject.com/pubs/SEImpact/SEImpact_Africa.PDF

43. Booysen FR. Social grants as safety nets for HIV/AIDS-affected households in South Africa. J Soc Aspects HIV/AIDS Res Alliance. 2004;1(1):45–56. PMid:17600999

44. Collins D, Leibbrandt M. The financial impact of HIV/AIDS on poor households in South Africa. AIDS. 2007;21(suppl. 7):S75-S81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000300538.28096.1c, PMid:18040168

45. Barnett T, Whiteside A. Poverty and HIV/AIDS: Impact, coping and mitigation strategy. AIDS, public policy and child well-being. Florence: UNICEF; 2002.

46. Gregson S, Mushati P, Nyamukapa C. Adult mortality and erosion of household viability in AIDS-afflicted towns, estates, and villages in Eastern Zimbabwe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(2):188–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000247230.68246.13

47. Akintola O. Gendered home-based care in South Africa: More trouble for the troubled. Afr J AIDS Res. 2006;5(3):237–247.http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085900609490385

48. Dold AP, Cocks ML. The trade in medicinal plants in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 2002;98:9.

49. Dorrington R, Johnson LF, Bradshaw D, Daniel T. The demographic impact of HIV/AIDS in South Africa. National and provincial indicators for 2006. Cape Town: Centre for Actuarial Research, South African Medical Research Council and Actuarial Society of South Africa; 2006.
Published
2012-01-11