The concept of a spatially continuous western boundary current in the Mozambique Channel has historically been based on erroneous interpretations of ships’
drift. Recent observations have demonstrated that the circulation in the Channel is instead dominated by anti-cyclonic eddies drifting poleward. It has therefore
been suggested that no coherent Mozambique Current exists at any time. However, satellite and other observations indicate that a continuous current – not
necessarily an inherent part of Mozambique Eddies – may at times be found along the full Mozambican shelf break. Using a high-resolution, numerical model
we have demonstrated how such a feature may come about. In the model, a continuous current is a highly irregularly occurring event, occurring about once per year,
with an average duration of only 9 days and with a vertical extent of about 800 m. Surface speeds may vary from 0.5 m/s to 1.5 m/s and the volume flux involved is
about 10 Sv. The continuous current may occasionally be important for the transport of biota along the continental shelf and slope.
The major western boundary current of the South Indian Ocean, the Agulhas Current, has traditionally been considered as continuously connected to the Mozambique Current to the
north.1 Observations of ships’ drift have indicated2,3 that strong poleward movements are found along the east African coast all the way from the
northern tip of the Mozambique Channel to the southern tip of Africa. These Eulerian measurements have then usually been interpreted as reflecting the existence of an unbroken
current along this whole coastline. Depictions of average geostrophic currents,4 based on all existing hydrographic data, also show a clear continuum.
Investigations by Lutjeharms5 and Sætre and Jorge da Silva6, using a compilation of quasi-synoptic hydrographic data from a number of research cruises,
have suggested that the circulation could be considerably more complicated, but this result, as it was based on observations from an eclectic collection of cruises, did not
fundamentally alter the existing view that there was a Mozambique Current.7 A numerical model study8 demonstrated that the increased level of eddy
kinetic energy seen in satellite altimetry could be explained by the existence of mesoscale eddies. Shortly after, a cruise specifically dedicated to an investigation of
the nature of the Mozambique Current9 was unable to find a continuous current and instead demonstrated that the channel was populated by a street of strong,
anti-cyclonic eddies slowly moving poleward. Subsequent studies,10,11,12 using mostly current observations in the narrows of the channel and anomalies of sea
surface height, have emphatically confirmed these conclusions. These eddies have been seen to form mostly at the narrows of the channel or directly equatorward of
here.11,12,13 A modelling study14 has shown that the obstruction formed by the land mass of Madagascar precludes the formation of a proper western
boundary current in the channel.
How important is the absence of a continuous western boundary current in the Mozambique channel? On a regional level, it has been shown that Mozambique Eddies carry coastal
chlorophyll into the centre of the channel,15 which an undisturbed western boundary current would not do, and that this might have an influence on the breeding
success of local marine birds.16 Furthermore, it has been shown17 that birds such as great frigate birds forage preferentially at the edges of these
eddies, suggesting that there are also concentrations of tuna at the fronts so formed, because the presence of these animals is closely related. Apart from the perceived
impact of eddies on the ecosystem, it has also been demonstrated that these eddies have an impact on the Agulhas Current downstream.18 Eddies drifting poleward
may trigger cyclonic perturbations such as the Natal Pulses at the coastline of South Africa near 30ºS, causing subsequent shedding of Agulhas Rings south of Africa and
thus controlling interocean heat and salt exchange.19 The existence and importance of Mozambique Eddies is therefore not in doubt. However, there does seem to
be some evidence for an intermittent, continuous flow along parts of the African coastline in the Mozambique Channel.6,20 Using satellite remote sensing and
modelling simulations, we established some evidence for such occurrences, their frequency, location and durability.
An inspection of satellite remote sensing products for the Mozambique Channel demonstrates their limited utility here. Instantaneous thermal infrared images of sufficiently
large parts of the channel to identify a continuous coastal current are scarce as a result of enduring and extensive cloud cover and are very seldom of sufficient duration
to test the persistence of any circulation feature. This limitation also holds for ocean colour images.15 Furthermore, surface heating during spells of weak winds
rapidly removes any surface temperature contrast. Hence such images can mostly be used for illustrative purposes only (e.g. Figure 1). If a continuous Mozambique Current were
to exist, it would most probably be hugging the continental shelf3 and thus in most parts be too close to the coast for appropriate investigation using altimetric
measurements. As a consequence we largely limit ourselves to analysing model simulations, using a model that represents well a wide spatial range of circulation features in
In this investigation we have used a high-resolution, 1/10º model (AG01) of the Agulhas region (20ºW–70ºE, 47ºS–7ºS) based on the Nucleus for European Modelling
of the Ocean (NEMO) code.22 It is forced by bulk formulae using daily, interannually varying wind and thermohaline surface forcing fields over the period
1980–2004.23 Its main, novel element is the ‘two-way nesting’24 of the regional model into this coarser, well-established global
model.21 The nesting approach allows one to study the effect of outside perturbations on the mesoscale components of the greater Agulhas circulation.19
One of these components is the circulation in the Mozambique Channel where outside perturbations have been shown to be particularly important.10 The model features
partially filled bottom cells (46 levels) and advanced advection schemes which have been shown to be crucial elements of a reasonable simulation of the Agulhas
regime.25 More technical detail on the model can be found in Biastoch et al.26
Current measurements across the narrows of the channel were from the LOCO (Long-term Ocean Climate Observations) mooring array. Detail on the disposition of this
array and the precision of its measurements can be found in Harlander et al.12
FIGURE 1: Thermal infrared image of the sea surface temperature from the MODIS AQUA satellite showing an extensive, warm current along the entire Mozambican
continental shelf. The image is for 13 July 2006 with temperatures given on the scale. This image is a one-day composite thus limiting cloud cover to the white areas.
Figure 1 shows an example of a tongue of warm water extending along a significant portion of the Mozambican shelf. The width of this plume varied, but is estimated
to have been at least 100 km along its full length. It extended from 14ºS to 27ºS, a distance of about 1500 km. Although the sea surface temperature on this occasion
suggests a number of other circulation features in this part of the Mozambique Channel, there seems to be no compelling evidence that this plume was in any way
connected to the Mozambique Eddies and that instead it was a continuous current.
The model simulation in Figure 2a shows a comparable portrayal, but in surface velocities. Here the current extends uninterruptedly from the northern to the southern
mouth of the Mozambique Channel. This simulation is in sharp contrast to the more characteristic portrayal in Figure 2b. Here the circulation consists of three
well-developed Mozambique Eddies, all about 300 km in diameter (comparable to those found by De Ruijter et al.9), with one being formed at the narrows
at the time. The continuous current in Figure 2a is relatively slow in its far northern part (0.5 m/s), but increases in velocity downstream with two maxima in speed
(up to 1.4 m/s) at 16ºS – the narrows of the Channel – and at 22ºS. The current follows the shelf edge (~100 m depth) quite closely, overshoots the Delagoa
Bight (25ºS) and feeds directly into the Agulhas Current to the south (28ºS) as one continuous current. There is evidence of cyclonic eddy activity in the channel at
the time of the simulation shown in Figure 2a, and a suggestion that the current is enhanced in strength by these eddies at the two locations where the speeds are highest.
However, there is no obvious relationship between these eddies and the full, extended current. The prevalence of such a continuous current and the frequency of its occurrence
An analysis of 25 years of model simulations indicates that the occurrence of a continuous current is atypical, intermittent and highly irregular. During this period it was
observed 21 times, but during a previous period of 14 years there was no evidence of such a feature at all, leading to an average of 0.84 times per year with a standard
deviation of 1.14. The average duration of a continuous current was 9 days (± 5) with a mode of less than 5 days (11 out of 21 of the occurrences). These results suggest
that it is a very short-lived event. In all cases, the continuous current breaks up into a string of eddies, particularly at the narrows of the channel and at 24ºS, just
upstream of the Delagoa Bight. However, eddies can be formed along the full length of the channel27 at the break-up of a current event.
The vertical structure of such a current is shown in Figure 3. The simulated current on this occasion had a surface speed of up to 1.1 m/s, had a well-developed
undercurrent9,26 and extended to a depth of 800 m. The flow on this occasion may have been partially as a result of an anti-cyclonic eddy with its centre
at about 42ºE (Figure 2) with a maximum surface speed in its eastern rim of 0.45 m/s. If this eddy was largely symmetrical, it would mean that the current itself had
a top speed of 0.65 m/s. This speed is comparable to the observed current speeds in the narrows of the channel. The example shown in Figure 3b exhibits strong southward
flow along the Mozambican shelf break, also to a depth of about 800 m. The surface speed was 0.9 m/s contrasting with a weak northward flow in the eastern side of the
channel where the maximum speeds were only about 0.2 m/s. This northward flow strengthened so that 15 days later there was a fully developed, anti-cyclonic eddy in the
narrows of the channel, but still enhanced on the western side. During a 4-year record for the LOCO moorings there were five occasions when the surface speeds could be
considered as not belonging to the surface expression of an eddy. However, on two of these occasions a subsurface eddy (at 1000 m) complicated the structure.
The volume transport along the full length of the modelled continuous current is given in Figure 4, based on what is observed in the green box in Figure 2. There is a
gradual increase from 0 Sv (106 m3/s) at the northern mouth (12ºS) to 21 Sv at 29ºS with peaks at the locations where anti-cyclonic eddies are
juxtaposed with the current (16ºS, 22ºS). Including the flux of the undercurrent reduces the volume transport of the current by about 5 Sv – 12 Sv, larger than
that measured for the undercurrent by De Ruijter et al.9 The sharp inflection point at 29ºS suggests that this is where the Agulhas Current starts and the
total transport, including that of the undercurrent, rapidly rises to 72 Sv, comparable to that observed.26,28 The increasing volume transport and depth of
the current makes the inclusion of the Agulhas Undercurrent relatively less relevant downstream, so increasing the depth of integration to 1000 m increases the total
volume transport south of 29ºS, in contrast to that in the Mozambique Channel.
FIGURE 2: Simulated velocities in the Mozambique Channel at a depth of 93 m in the NEMO model for (a) 07 February 1994 and (b) 25 October 1993. (b) Shows the normal
current configuration in which three strong anti-cyclonic eddies are evident, all heading poleward. In contrast, (a) presents the more unusual case of a continuous current
along the full length of the Mozambican shelf; this current on this occasion stayed intact for about 5 days. The geographic locations of a vertical speed section across the
simulated current at 16°S (Figure 3) and the coastal-following section (Figure 4) are shown by green lines. Arrows indicate current directions.
FIGURE 3: (a) A vertical speed section across a simulated Mozambique Current on 07 February 1994 in the NEMO model simulation (equatorward motion is indicated in
grey; contour interval is 5 cm/s). The section was at 16°S latitude (see Figure 2). (b) A comparable speed section from the Long-term Ocean Climate Observations (LOCO)
mooring array at about the same location for 29 June 2005 when there was evidence of a Mozambique Current.
FIGURE 4: The volume transport (in Sv), integrated along a coastal-following
section over the full length of a Mozambique Current on 07 February 1994 (see
Figure 2). The broken line represents the transport to a depth of 800 m and the
continuous line represents the full depth integral. The grey line represents the
transport (over the full depth) on 23 October 1993.
Based on a 25-year simulation of the circulation in the Mozambique Channel, supported by a few observations from satellite and current meter moorings, we have
reached the conclusion that a continuous western boundary current along the Mozambican shelf edge may on occasion come about, but that this is a very exceptional
event that invariably lasts for only a short time. It therefore probably plays a negligible role in the channel through flow but it may occasionally open a ‘window’
for the transport of biota, such as larvae, along the continental shelf and slope.
This research was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, the University of Cape Town and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
project BO 907/2-2 in Germany. We thank the NRF and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung for support that has made travel by participants possible,
including a visit by J.R.E.L. to Kiel during which this work was initiated. J.R.E.L. also thanks the IMAU for financial support during a visit there. The LOCO
project was funded by the Board of Earth and Life Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Christo Whittle of the Marine Remote Sensing
Unit at the University of Cape Town produced the satellite image.
Prof. Emeritus Johann R.E. Lutjeharms, colleague, mentor and friend, passed away on 08 June 2011.
We declare that we have no financial or personal relationships which may have inappropriately influenced us in writing this article.
Dr Ridderinkhof and Prof. De Ruijter were responsible for the current mooring project and data. Dr Van der Werf analysed the current meter data; Dr
Biastochdesigned and ran the general ocean circulation model; and all authors contributed to the concept of the investigation and the writing of the manuscript.
1.Lutjeharms JRE. The Agulhas Current. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.
2.Michaelis G. Die Wasserbewegung an der Oberfläche des Indischen Ozeans im Januar und Juli. Veröff. [The movement of water on the surface of the Indian Ocean in January and July]. Berlin: Institut für Meereskunde, Universität Berlin; 1923. German.
3.Duncan CP, Schladow SG. World surface currents from ship’s drift observations. Int Hydrogr Rev. 1981;58:101–112.
4.Wyrtki K. Oceanographic atlas of the International Indian Ocean Expedition. Washington DC: National Science Foundation; 1971.
5.Lutjeharms JRE. A quantitative assessment of year-to-year variability in water movement in the South-west Indian Ocean. Nature. 1972;239:59–60.
6.Sætre R, Jorge da Silva A. The circulation of the Mozambique Channel. Deep-Sea Res. 1984;31:485–508.
7.Sætre R. Surface currents in the Mozambique Channel. Deep-Sea Res. 1985;32:1457–1467.
8.Biastoch A, Krauß W. The role of mesoscale eddies in the source regions of the Agulhas Current. J Phys Oceanogr. 1999;29:2303–2317.
9.De Ruijter WPM, Ridderinkhof H, Lutjeharms JRE, Schouten MW, Veth C. Observations of the flow in the Mozambique Channel. Geophys Res Lett. 2002;29:1401–1403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013714
10.Schouten MW, De Ruijter WPM, Van Leeuwen PJ, Ridderinkhof H. Eddies and variability in the Mozambique Channel. Deep-Sea Res II. 2003;50:1987–2003.
11.Ridderinkhof H, De Ruijter WPM. Moored current observations in the Mozambique Channel. Deep-Sea Res II. 2003;50:1933–1955.
12.Harlander U, Ridderinkhof H, Schouten MW, De Ruijter WPM. Long-term observations of transport, eddies, and Rossby waves in the Mozambique Channel. J Geophys Res. 2009;114:C02003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004846
13.Ridderinkhof H, Van der Werf PM, Ullgren J, Van Leeuwen PJ, Van Aken HM, De Ruijter WPM. Seasonal and interannual variability in the Mozambique
Channel from moored current observations. J Geophys Res. 2010;115:C06010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005619
14.Penven P, Lutjeharms JRE, Florenchie P. Madagascar: A pacemaker for the Agulhas Current system? Geophys Res Lett. 2006;33:L17609.
15.Quartly GD, Srokosz MA. Eddies in the southern Mozambique Channel. Deep-Sea Res II. 2004;51:69–83.
16.Jaquemet S, Le Corre M, Quartly GD. Ocean control of the breeding regime of the sooty tern in the southwest Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res I. 2007;54:130–142.
17.Weimerskirch H, Le Corre M, Jaquemet S, Potier M, Marsac F. Foraging strategy of a top predator in tropical waters: Great frigatebirds in the Mozambique Channel. Mar Ecol Progr Ser. 2004;275:297–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps275297
18.Schouten MW, De Ruijter WPM, Van Leeuwen PJ. Upstream control of Agulhas ring shedding. J Geophys Res. 2002;107(C8):3109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000804
19.Biastoch A, Böning C, Lutjeharms J, Scheinert M. Mesoscale perturbations control inter-ocean exchange south of Africa. Geophys Res Lett. 2008;35:L20602.
20.Lutjeharms JRE, Jorge Da Silva A. The Delagoa Bight eddy. Deep-Sea Res. 1988;35:619–634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90134-3
21.Biastoch A, Böning CW, Scheinert M, Lutjeharms JRE. The Agulhas system as a key region of the global circulation. In: Nagel WE, Kröner DB, Resch MM, editors. High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering '08. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008; p. 459–469.
22.Madec G. NEMO ocean engine. Technical Report 27. Paris: Institute Pierre Simon Laplace; 2006.
23.Large WG, Yeager SG. Diurnal to decadal global forcing for ocean and sea-ice models: The data sets and flux climatologies. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/ TN-460 + STR. Boulder, CO: National Centre for Atmospheric Research; 2004.
24.Debreu L, Vouland C, Blayo E. AGRIF: Adaptive grid refinement in Fortran. Comput Geosci. 2008;34:8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.01.009
25.Barnier B, Madec G, Penduff T, et al. Impact of partial steps and momentum advection schemes in a global ocean circulation model at eddy permitting
resolution. Ocean Dyn. 2006;56:543–567. http://dx.doi.org/10.107/s10236-006-0082-1
26.Biastoch A, Beal L, Lutjeharms JRE, Casal TGD. Variability and coherence of the Agulhas Undercurrent in a high-resolution ocean general circulation model. J Phys Oceanogr. 2009;10:2417–2435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4184.1
27.Swart NC, Lutjeharms JRE, Ridderinkhof H, De Ruijter WPM. Observed characteristics of Mozambique Channel eddies. J Geophys Res. 2010;115:C09006.
28.Bryden HL, Beal LM, Duncan LM. Structure and transport of the Agulhas Current and its temporal variability. J Oceanogr. 2005;61:479–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10872-005-0057-8