In early May 2012, South Africa will take delivery of a new polar research ship, the SA Agulhas II,
representing a significant investment of R1.6 billion in polar infrastructure to further strengthen South Africa’s
presence in the polar region, particularly in support of its stewardship of the Southern Ocean and Antarctic Treaty obligations.
This investment follows closely on recent DST–CSIR infrastructure investments in the Centre for High Performance Computing,
used to run global ocean–climate models, an ocean robotics observational capability and five other new research facilities.
Together, these investments offer opportunities to enhance South Africa’s advanced numerical and technological capacity
as well as its impact on Southern Hemisphere polar climate and ecosystem science by using its geographical advantage.
We are planning the first scientific programme that will capitalise on these major infrastructure investments:
the Southern Ocean Seasonal Cycle Experiment (SOSCEx).|
The Southern Ocean is arguably the main source of medium-term uncertainty in terms of the effectiveness of global CO2
mitigation plans. The reason for this is that the Southern Ocean plays both an important role in the uptake
of anthropogenic CO2 (50% of all ocean uptake) as well as in the very large (90 Gt/Cy) natural CO2
exchange between the oceans and the atmosphere. The Southern Ocean is the only region where deep-ocean CO2
reservoirs (38 000 Gt C) exchange directly with the smaller atmospheric reservoir (700 Gt C). Moreover,
although 85% of all ocean productivity is supported by nutrients derived from the Southern Ocean, little is known about
the sensitivity of these carbon and nutrient fluxes to climate change driven adjustments or – most importantly –
at what scales these links couple. One of the important gaps in the reliable prediction of the response of the Southern Ocean
carbon cycle to climate change is its sensitivity to seasonal, subseasonal forcings (in time) and mesoscales (in space).
The Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observatory (SOCCO), a CSIR-led consortium, is planning SOSCEx, which will be a new
type of large-scale experiment. SOSCEx reflects a shift from the historical focus on ship-based descriptive Southern
Ocean oceanography and living resource conservation, to system-scale dynamics studies spanning much greater time and space scales.
Our limited grasp on these climate and climate-feedback sensitivities are linked to key knowledge gaps on the
scales that link climate to carbon. Moreover, existing global models show only weak agreement in terms of the
seasonal cycle of the upper-ocean in both physical and biogeochemical indicators such as primary productivity
(Lenton A, Tilbrook B 2011, personal communication, Aug 01). The seasonal cycle is one of the strongest modes
of variability in the primary productivity and the carbon cycle of the Southern Ocean. Additionally it reflects
the coupling between climate forcing and important ecosystem responses, such as productivity.1
The ultimate sensitivity of the ecosystem over seasonal time scales is governed by their adapted phenological
characteristics. However, climate forecast models are not able to reflect this seasonal timing reliably,
which casts some doubt about our understanding of the scales at which climate and biogeochemistry are
linked in the Southern Ocean. In addition, there appear to be important regional and basin differences
in the way that carbon and ocean productivity respond to this otherwise regular seasonal forcing.
Uncertainties in the understanding of the sensitivities of the biogeochemical cycles to changes in
the climate forcing factors, hampers our ability to understand the long-term trends. Thus there is a
need for a seasonal cycle experiment using autonomous platforms that focus on these scales (Figure 1),
most importantly on the link between the physical forcing mechanisms and biogeochemical responses over the whole annual cycle.
At a recent workshop2 convened to discuss the role of the seasonal cycle in coupling climate
and carbon cycling in the Southern Ocean, two approaches were identified, (1) developing seasonal scale
views to understand regional contrasts in the timing of the onset and evolution of phytoplankton blooms
and (2) developing targeted ocean physics–carbon–ecosystem process studies
in regional ‘hotspots’.23 For SOSCEx, it is hypothesised that
climate change signals will be reflected in changes to the magnitude, timing and persistence
of the seasonal cycle in mixed-layer physics and biogeochemistry and, in particular,
the carbon cycle.2 We also propose that a high-resolution approach to advancing
our understanding of the coupling of carbon and climate will reduce the uncertainty in projections
of long-term trends in the ocean’s natural carbon fluxes and the anthropogenic carbon sink.
FIGURE 1: A space–time plot showing relative scale magnitudes of a number of
platforms (ships, instrumented moorings and gliders), the seasonal cycle and
climate projections. This graphical representation emphasises that, even with
both ships and moorings observational platforms, it is not possible to address
questions on the seasonal cycle sensitivity of climate projections without using
autonomous platforms. Ocean gliders are uniquely poised to bridge the spatial
and temporal gap between ships and moorings – a bridge which critically covers
the seasonal ‘window’ in the Southern Ocean Seasonal Cycle Experiment.
Recent studies highlight substantial variability in the response of Southern Ocean biological productivity
to physical forcing on interannual, seasonal and subseasonal timescales.1,4,5 A key factor
in the responses appears to be the variable control of phytoplankton growth by iron or light
limitation.4 The spatially and temporally variable rates of buoyancy (heating)
and momentum (wind mixing) forcing define the seasonal evolution of the light–iron
status of the euphotic zone – the layer where photosynthesis occurs.5
These studies emphasise the importance of understanding the coupling of physics to biogeochemistry
at subseasonal scales and submesoscales.6,7 The stark seasonal transition in the seasonal
cycle phase between the Subtropical and Subantarctic zones1 provides an ideal test to
understand this coupling. These frontal regions are believed to play pivotal roles in the variability
of the mixed layer and vertical velocities caused by submesoscale processes that evolve at the fronts
as a result of current meandering and eddy–eddy interaction.8 Researchers have now
recognised that submesoscale structures account for approximately 50% of the total resolved
variance7,8 observed from high-resolution satellite imagery, whilst vertical velocity
variance shows a tenfold increase when numerical simulation resolutions increase from 6 km
to 1 km.9 This high variance underscores the potential magnitude of the vertical
nutrient supply and gas transport at small scales that impact on the overall primary productivity.
SOSCEx has four main themes which address the same intraseasonal and submesoscale questions which link the carbon
cycle to climate variability: mixed-layer stratification dynamics;
CO2 and O2 gas exchange with the atmosphere; carbon export from the mixed layer;
and the bio-optics linking water column inherent optical properties to outgoing-satellite visible irradiance.
In SOSCEx, concurrent in-situ observational and modelling approaches
are used to investigate the sampling scales necessary for in-situ observations
and testing hypotheses at larger temporal and spatial scales. The modelling experiments
will initially be used in two ways. The first is an ’upstream mode’ in which
the model is a surrogate database that enables us – a priori – to try to
determine optimal strategies for positioning gliders (Figure 2) by deploying virtual
gliders in the model and investigating the effects of different sampling strategies
on their recovery in order to anticipate the scales of variability we can expect.
By contrast, the second way, a ‘downstream mode’, will use the model
after the experiment in order to test new model parameterisations and to compare
modelled and observed scales of variability. The research plan is coordinated to
span approaches that encompass in-situ and remotely sensed observations,
modelling and laboratory experiments.
FIGURE 2: Gliders will be deployed south of Gough Island (in September 2012)
and then allowed to proceed downstream with the major Southern Ocean
fronts (blue lines), before being retrieved at the GoodHope line (between
December 2012 and February 2013) or allowed to continue to Marion Island if
battery energy can be sustained. The fronts are depicted as the mean position,
between 2007 and 2008, derived from satellite altimetry data. The bathymetry
is underlaid (greyscale shading in metres below sea level).
The experiment is planned to take place around the three annual logistical trips
of the ship, starting with the spring voyage to Gough Island, the mid-summer voyage
to the South African National Antarctic Expedition (SANAE) base and the autumn voyage
to Marion Island with little (5–10 days) additional time required above the existing schedule.
In-situ sampling will begin in September 2012 during the austral spring relief
voyage from Cape Town to Gough Island (located at 40.2°S, 10°E). The four iRobot®
SeagliderTM units (Figure 2) will be deployed from the ship (1) south of the Subtropical Front, (2)
in the Subantarctic Zone, (3) at the Subantarctic Front and (4) in the northern Polar Frontal Zone.
The seagliders will be programmed to profile the water column from the surface to a depth of 1000 m and
at a nominal horizontal resolution of every 4 km (4 dives/day). Carbon–explorer floats will
be deployed at the same locations as each glider and two Liquid Robotics wave–glider units will be
deployed in the Subantarctic Zone and Polar Frontal Zone to sample CO2
and oxygen to derive their fluxes. Each of the units will then be intercepted during
the summer SANAE poleward or equatorward legs and finally retrieved in the autumn on
the Marion Island trip. Full-depth water column profiles, including clean casts for
iron chemistry, will be undertaken at each release and interception location.
This sampling will provide us with the biogeochemical and physics boundary
conditions of the system, such as CO2 levels, nutrients,
iron concentrations, phytoplankton species composition and bio-optics.
It will also allow for calibration and quality checks of the data received
from the temperature, salinity, oxygen, backscatter, fluorescence and
photosynthetically active radiation sensors housed on the gliders.
Concurrent on-board bio-assay incubation experiments will examine the
limiting factor of phytoplankton growth to be determined (light or iron)
and contribute to improving model parameterisation in the Southern Ocean.
The water column process stations will be supplemented by six profiles to
1000 m along the meridional axis of the sampling. Continuous remotely
sensed data will be collected and used as an independent, large-scale data set before,
during and after the period of the experiment. These data include, for example, sea
surface height and temperature data to inform on the dynamics of ocean circulation,
while ocean colour data will be used as an indicator of primary production and biomass
accumulation in the surface waters.
SOSCEx provides a new and unprecedented opportunity to gain a better understanding of the
links between climate drivers and ecosystem productivity and climate feedbacks in the Southern Ocean.
This combined high-resolution approach to both observations and modelling experiments will permit us,
for the first time, to address some key questions relating to the physical nature of the Southern Ocean and its carbon cycle.
1. Thomalla SJ, Fauchereau N, Swart S, Monteiro PMS. Regional scale characteristics of the seasonal
cycle of chlorophyll in the Southern Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2011;8:2849–2866.
2. Monteiro PMS, Boyd P, Bellerby R. Role of the seasonal cycle in coupling climate and carbon
cycling in the Subantarctic zone. Eos Trans AGU. 2011;92(28):235.
3. Sallée J, Speer K, Rintoul S, Wijffels S. Southern Ocean thermocline ventilation.
J Phys Oceanogr. 2010;40:509–529.
4. Fauchereau N, Tagliabue A, Bopp L, Monteiro PMS. The response of phytoplankton biomass
to transient mixing events in the Southern Ocean. Geophys Res Lett. 2011;38:L17601.
5. Lévy M, Klein P, Ben Jelloul M. New production stimulated by high-frequency winds in
a turbulent mesoscale eddy field. Geophys Res Lett. 2009;36:L16603.
6. Klein P, Lapeyre G. The oceanic vertical pump induced by mesoscale and submesoscale turbulence.
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2009;1:351–375.
7. Glover DM, Doney SC, Nelson NB, Wallis A. Submesoscale anisotropy (fronts, eddies, and filaments)
as observed near Bermuda with ocean color data. Paper presented at: 2008 Ocean Sciences Meeting.
Proceedings of the 2008 Ocean Sciences Meeting; 2008 March 02–07; Orlando, Florida, USA.
8. Taylor JR, Ferrari R. Ocean fronts trigger high latitude phytoplankton blooms. Geophys Res Lett. 2011;38:L23601.
9. Klein P, Hua BL, Lapeyre G, Capet X, Le Gentil S, Sasaki H. Upper ocean turbulence from high 3-D resolution simulations.
J Phys Oceanogr. 2008;38:1748–1763.